Keywords: letter, epistolary text, speech etiquette, final etiquette formulas, A. V. Suvorov, E. R. Dashkova


The purpose of the study is to define the lexical and grammatical features of the final etiquette formulas in Russian letters of the 18th century, to describe the functional and semantic types of formulas, to characterize their syntactic structure. The object of study is letters addressed to different persons by the outstanding Russian commander A. V. Suvorov and Princess E. R. Dashkova. The research material is 120 enclosed etiquette formulas extracted from letters with a continuous sampling method. The descriptive method of research has been used in the article. Practical application is possible in the process of teaching the stylistics of the Russian language. Conclusions: The final etiquette formulas are an important structural element of the ending of a letter, usually preceding the signature of the addressee. We have identified the following functional-semantic types of final etiquette formulas in Russian letters of the 18th century: 1) formulas of forgiveness; 2) formulas of wishes (wishes of physical and mental health, God's help and blessing); 3) parakinesthetic final etiquette formulas (verbal transmission of a gesture or an action); 4) honorific final etiquette formulas (direct or indirect indication by the addressor the addressee's positive qualities). The basis of the construction of the final etiquette formulas often lies in one or another speech cliche, however these cliches are spread by dependent syntactic components, as a result of which the final etiquette formulas in the letters under study are diverse in their syntactic structure. The perspective of the present study is in the research of the dynamics of the final etiquette formulas of writing in the epistolary of the 18th – 20th centuries, as well as in a more detailed explanation of the pragmatics and functioning of the etiquette formulas depending on the nature of the communicative situation.


1. Atanasova-Sokolova, D. (2006), “Talking with you through the letter…”: Letters of M.N. Muravyev. P. 1. New philological bulletin [“Govorja s toboju chrez pis'mo...”: Pis'ma M. N. Murav'eva. Ch. 1. Novyj filologicheskij vestnik / In-t fi-lologii i istorii RGGU. 2006. № 1.], URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/govorya-s-toboyu-chrez-pismo-pisma-m-n-muravieva-chast-i (due date: 04/10/2019).

2. Balakaj, A. G. (2002), Russian speech etiquette and the principles of its lexicographical description: author's abstract [Russkij rechevoj jetiket i principy ego leksikograficheskogo opisanija: avtoref. dis. ... dokt. filol. nauk], Orjol, 40 p.

3 Balakaj, A. G. (2007), Dictionary of Russian speech etiquette: approx. 6000 etiquette words and expressions. 3rd ed., corr. and add. [Slovar' russkogo rechevogo jetiketa: ok. 6000 jetiketnyh slov i vyrazhenij. 3-e izd., ispr. i dop.], Astrel': AST: Hranitel', Moscow, 767 p.

4 Bulanin, D. M. (1989), The Writers. Dictionary of scribes and literacy of ancient Russia (second half of the XIV – XVI centuries. Vol. 2. Part 2. L – YA. [Pis'movniki. Slovar' knizhnikov i knizhnosti Drevney Rusi (vtoraya polovina XIV–XVI vv. Vyp. 2. CH. 2. L–YA.], Nauka, Leningrad, pp. 188–193.

5 Golikova, N. S., Popova, I. S. (2009), Ethiket and the culture of moving school in high schools: scientific and methodological manual. [Etiket і kul'tura movnogo spіlkuvannja u vishhіj shkolі: navch.-metod. pos.] Dnipropetrovsk: View of Dnipropetr. university, 160 p.

6 Dashkova, Ye. R. (2001), On the meaning of the word "education". Writings, letters, documents / comp., Introd. Art. and approx. G. I. Smagina [O smysle slova «vospitanie». Sochinenija, pis'ma, dokumenty / sost., vstup. st. i prim. G. I. Smaginoj], Dmitriy Bulanin Publishing House, St. Petersburg, 460 p.

7 Katarzhina, S. L. (2001), Etiquette formulas in letters to friends of the Russian creative people at the begin – of the 20th century: dissertation [Jetiketnye formuly v pis'mah k druz'jam russkoj tvorcheskoj intelligencii nachala XX v. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk], Orsk, 156 p.

8 Kuvarova, E. K. (2011), “Final etiquette formula in a letter as a speech work”. Scientific notes of the Tauride National University. V.I. Vernadsky. Series: Philology. Social communication. T. 24 (63). No. 4. Part 2. [“Zakljuchitel'naja jetiketnaja formula v pis'me kak rechevom proizvedenii”, Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo nacional'nogo universi-teta im. V. I. Vernadskogo. Serija: Filologija. Social'nye kommunikacii. T. 24 (63). № 4. Ch. 2.], Simferopol, pp. 289–296.

9 Musaeljan, S. S. (2008), Etiquette Communichems of the Russian Language: Systemic and Functional Aspects: author's abstract [Jetiketnye kommunikemy russkogo jazyka: sistemnyj i funkcional'nyj aspekty : avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk], Rostov-na-Donu, 27 p.

10 Prohorov, E. I. (1964), “Edition of the epistolary heritage”, Principles of the publication of epistolary texts: Ques-tions of textology [“Izdanie jepistoljarnogo nasledija”, Principy izdanija jepistoljarnyh tekstov: Voprosy tekstologii], issue 3, Nauka, Moscow, pp. 6–72.

11 Starostin, K. A. (2018), “Etiquette speech signs in letters from the front”, Philology. Questions of theory and practice [“Jetiketnye rechevye znaki v pis'mah s fronta”, Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki], Gramota, № 7(85). P. 1, Tambov, pp. 168–172.

12 Suvorov, A. V. (1986), Letters / edition prepared by V.S. Lopatin [Pis'ma / izdanie podgotovil V. S. Lopatin], Nau-ka, Moscow, 808 p.

13 Teleki, M. M., Shinkaruk, V. D. (2007), The Social Category of Mode in the texts of the Epipolar Genre: monоgraphs [Socіal'nі kategorії modusu v tekstah epіstoljarnogo zhanru: monografіja], view of the MDGU of Petra Mogili, Kyiv; Mykolaiv, 172 p.

14 Falina, V. А. (2008), “New trends in the design of the ending of an unofficial letter of the mid-XIX – early XX centuries”, Bulletin of the Faculty of Humanities of the Ivanovo State University of Chemical Technology [“Novye tendentsii oformleniya kontsovki neofitsial'nogo pis'ma serediny XIX – nachala XX veka”, Vestnik gumanitarnogo fakul'teta Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo khimiko-tekhnologicheskogo uni-versiteta], issue 3, pp. 262–266.

15 Fedorchenko, P. Yu. (2001), Honoriphic Potential of Speech as the Basis of Ideal Speech Behavior (on the material of the novel by F. M. Dostoevsky “Idiot”): dissertation [Gonor-ificheskiy potentsial rechi kak osnova ideal'nogo rechevogo povedeniya (na materiale romana F. M. Dostoyevskogo «Idiot»): dis. ... kand. filol. nauk], Belgorod, 275 p.
How to Cite
Podoprigora, A. (2019). LEXICAL AND GRAMMATICAL FEATURES OF FINAL ETIQUETTE FORMULAS IN RUSSIAN LETTERS OF THE XVIII CENTURY. Problems of General and Slavic Linguistics, (3), 117-124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15421/251915